Australia's Non-Essentials given the NDIS mark for Neglect to Death
This is my submission to NDIS when you read its contents you will know this agency & the NDIS tribunals must be shut down. It was a last minute rush lodge again but I think the message that
NDIS & the tribunals are a disgrace will shine through
Health & welfare sits at s51xxiiiA in the Australian Constitution Act. The actions of this committee or any public servant assigned thereto are not in s51 good government “order” if it does not refer to a higher criminal authority every individuals case put before it that demonstrates unlawfulness of a systemic nature is occuring at NDIA. Committees continually lay claim that they do not have any power to deal with individual cases. Under the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Commonwealth) I put it to you the cherry picking of accepted submissions & repeated rejection of cases that expose the breathtaking level of illegality coming from actions of the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) itself is "concealing a serious indictable offence" or "misprision of felony".
I will remind Committee Members that as a public inquiry on a topic that is empowered by s51, good government “Order” must be seen to be given. Ergo Natural Justice must be upheld & the principle let the other side be heard must apply. Not applying a print all to public submissions regardless of content fails to meet this principle. Accepting as correspondence, but not publishing public submissions is denying the other side a right to be heard by the public whose funds are used to hold inquiries. Further as ratified signatories to international human rights conventions rejecting submissions because the authors choose to circulate their submissions in other forums eg social media falls foul of ICCPR Article19.
Failure to print public submissions affording the submitters the legal protections to harm for eg exposing corruption in National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA)’s scheme National Disability Insurance Scheme using getouts of it being a public health issue is not going to work this time either. NDIS CEO of Integrity Transformation & Technology Services Mr Dardo, has already given evidence before Senate that after over 10 years of operation as at 3 June 2024 only were controls being implemented. I have only one life to give so I asked both Grok & Google AI how many govt inquiries to NDIS there have been & with their vast data banks neither one could answer the question because there have been so many. As a wheely for life amputee neglected to hospitlisation twice by NDIS & looking at the only people getting money out of NDIS are crooks & people investigating the crooks s51 good government order has completely skipped this agency.
This is what law looks like please do not insult our intelligence with yet another attempt to cover up what has been going on at NDIS. I am publishing this submission in other places because I’ve found I can lodge a complementary Crimes Against Humanity Action. Disabled in WWII were the first people targeted by the Nazis. I really don’t care about the threat of silence or 5yrs jail. The Nazis threatened similar measures to their political opponents it strengthens my ICC case. I consider anyone looking at the premature death rap sheet for NDIS, My Aged Care, Robodebt knows we are not in Kansas but Minneapolis right now. Some politicians have stepped up & crossed floors defying their party instructions to oppose the censorships aimed at keeping a lid on mass murder. If you cannot let people have their say in a public inquiry we paid for we don’t want you.
I declare that I reported NDIA to the Auditor General’s Office prior to a Decision in an AAT being given, because the newly appointed Labor AAT Member told me which way she was “leaning” before even looking at the evidence. That public AAT followed lodgement of a Special Review specifically to detect fraud lodged end of 23 December 2023. I can prove that absolutely no review was ever done. I hold a Diploma of Accounting & have well over a decades experience as a senior bookkeeper. The garnishee was done only on a computer transaction list. The High Court ( Pintarich v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCAFC 79 Computers cannot be relied on without human intervention). There were items on my transaction list that were so vague there was not even a plan category allocated. Major equipment that had never been supplied, what appeared to be duplicate transactions & cleaning accounts charging travel time when I lived 2km from a super council’s post office. There was no human intervention at all with my transaction list. By the time I got to ART (after the AAT for the same matter I supposedly had had a Special Circumstance Review, A Special Review (specially to detect fraud), lodged 2 & had 1 Internal Review the latter expedited by NDIA’s legal representive & yet when the ART Member cherry picked the bed NDIA’s legal representatives still wanted more time to come up with a proof of delivery. In a business audit you fail if you cannot produce a source document related to a transaction. A business is not required to pay for anything it has never received & proof of delivery can be produced.
When a year & a half after stealing my money in bad faith & keeping a refund from me in bad faith how did NDIS respond. Their legal represented put lies to the tribunal that I had refused the bed delivery. The Senior Member had before her email evidence that showed I did not even have an agreed Plan at the time the bed was supposedly ordered & I had made aware all parties prior my Plan expiry date & was chasing up bed trials after the order was allegedly placed. This Senior Member had no intention of considering any evidence I put before her & in fact bizzarly at one stage she gave NDIA’s legals the job of collating the T-Doc bundle. NDIA’s legals made hay with that & removed & rearranged my sequenced evidence showing NDIA was subject to Australian Consumer Law.
The Senior Member’s continually denied to give me my Australian Consumer Law Rights of proof of debt because NDIA’s legals in writing told the ART I did not have them. The Senior Member was given a signed joint statement appearing on NDIS website that contradicted this. Ignored.
I am a wheely amputee & have been a participant of NDIS since December 2017. First in Toowoomba Qld & now in Coober Pedy SA. I have had 2x Administrative Appeals Tribunals (AAT) & 1x Administrative Review Tribunals (ART). I am still waiting for a review request of my 2019 plan that would enable me to go to tribunal to fight it. I will never get that review because in my review to get a review I was able to show NDIA as Respondent at a Brisbane Tribunal gave false information in the tribunal related to the Qld Transport Card & descriminated by State on the transport allowance allocation that we should have been receiving as wheelys. The McGarrigle Victoria case shows that Qld wheely taxi users have disproportionately been allocated a grossly inadequate transport allowance for years. I cited this case in my AAT Brisbane Tribunal for why I should get an increase from the less than $2,600 per year transport allowance. Mr McGarrigle does not require a special taxi. He receives nearly $12K per year. NDIS is a federal disbursement of money for the disabled. If disabled people in Victoria can get 75% of their transport then why when a Decision was in place did I not have that request instantly approved. Why am I still sat on $2600 when a Federal Court has upheld McGarrigles right & set precedence in a higher authority than AAT Brisbane. I want the money that NDIA denied all wheelys for nearly a decade. My Member was Fiona Meagher & she was promoted to a Senior Member just in time for when her father frmr high court judge Ian Callinan was doing a review of the AAT. Daddy’s little girl & pointless attempting a legal appeal to a disgracefully poor Decision.
The Disability Discrimination Act s24c means NDIA has been unlawfully providing services to all NDIS participants. NDIS participants were entitled to a lawful trading environment where they could have choice & control. NDIS participants that did not self-manage are forced to use Plan Managers & Support Coordinators who are appallingly criminal by their own Integrity Chief’s admission. NDIA has known this has been happening for years but has criminally been failing to report it because they have been profiting from it. In fact I have an email from an NDIA legal representative that shows that NDIA don’t believe they have to give me Australian Consumer Law rights. Disability homecare is a s51xxiiiA entitled & paid right. Paid for by the National Welfare Fund 7.5% income tax levy adjustment that formed the agreed environment under which the referendum for s51xxiiiA was passed.
Many disabled people in NDIS have private legal actions & NDIA has been claiming “compensation” based solely on an unverified transaction list total compiled primarily by its 90% fraudulent poorly qualified but registered providers. It is not rocket science. Garnisheeing that total transaction value from private legal settlements & not doing any form of review meaning no appropriate human intervention has occured in that environment is theft.
NDIS trained, registered & forced participants to use their often monopoly market place. Per the NDIS National Dashboard as at 31st March 2015 only 27% self manage or partially manage their Plans. Unlike USA most participants in Australia get extremely low payouts for disability in legal settlements. Governments like Qld have helped insurance companies by setting low claimable levels for disability insurance. Federal governments have consistently underfunded legal aids to a point that disabled participants have no alternative but to agree with lawyers to 50/50% settlements. There is no way participants in most cases even with a legal win have enough to afford to self manage. So NDIS has become a scheme that benefits the rich over the poor. There is no means test but there doesn’t need to be. If you are rich enough you can have the promised choice & control because you can wait months to get reimbursed & lawyer up every time they dont. The 27% is down 1% from last year because anyone that budgets knows inflation is through the roof.
In my case $35K was garnisheed by NDIA from my private legal settlement alleging it was compensation to repay themselves. NDIA paid no legal fees towards my privately funded action & yet claimed 100% of theirfraudulent transaction list. They considered the legal starting claimed amount of $2M but not the actual settled amount that after legal fees & having NDIA steal by garnishee $35K left me with about 150K.
NDIS is not means tested & it shouldn’t be. S51xxiiiA is a fully paid entitlement. My taxes were dutifully paid with that National Welfare Fund 7.5% increase to income tax adjustment that promised purpose specific things like home care in exchange for it, forming the commonlaw environment to a 1946 referendum. Had I not paid the 7.5% to the government to manage my health & welfare I would of course had the money to fund private insurances eg health insurance & unemployment insurance. NDIA & NDIS both advertise within their very name that they are an insurance entity. I had 2x superannuation company payouts of total permanent disability insurance & I was able to claim & keep both without it affecting my Centrelink benefits because my assets were below the threshhold. If NDIS is a disability insurance scheme why am I rebilled “compensation” for insurance my taxes paid for? Whilst there may be a case that I was not entitled to a 3rd insurance if an asset threshhold was in place NDIS was supposed to be non-means tested. Like many people with a disability win I bought a house that could be modified to suit my wheelchair needs. In excess of $35K was spent on levelling floors & a bathroom modification for the wheelchair. Had NDIS been even remotely operating a manner it has advertised wheely modifications should have been reimbursed. At a $200 plus per fortnight Centrelink rent allowance saved because I bought a cheap fixer upper $1xdeposit & balance $59,999 on settlement in a little over 6yrs the govt will have saved more than the $35K it stole. Almost all my money has gone on my property modifications & disability provides that NDIS regularly advertises it provides. It is a bunch of liars. I was sat in a motel I was paying for $100 from being homeless when news of my settlement came through. There were no empty disability houses. I would argue that even if the transactions on the list were valid & they weren’t it was an undue s51xxxi property acquisition because I should have had an avenue I could have claimed the payments for the home modifications & there was none.
I have considered the law of agency & I believe it applies to NDIA & they are liable for the harm, theft & fraud of their providers. NDIA trained, registered, even suggested uniform logos to them. NDIA & not me was liable for the fraud of their registered providers. Certainly not when I can show in Toowoomba the only local physical Support Coordinator offered to me was so bad she was removed by the Brisbane Tribunal. She promptly started up Envision in her own name & NDIS instantly registered her again. Further I do not believe the Lynch v. International Harvest Co 60 F.2d 223 (10th Cir 1932) law of franchisees is applicable. In that case consumers did not have a closed monopoly of traders created by International Harvester Co. (IHC) itself. IHC customers could freely choose to use an IHC franchisee or a totally different company. For the majority of NDIS participants this was financially not an option. Participants like me that did not self-manage were forced to use NDIS because funding to all other disability organisations was cut when NDIS entered an area.
The Commonwealth had the duty of care to ensure that disability home care was provided & all parliament a constitutional imperitive that it must be provided in a manner to vulnerable people in s51 good government order. It did not do that in Qld. In Qld NDIS started 1st July 2017 & the NDIS Quality & Safeguards commission (NQSC) was not active until 2yrs later 1st July, 2019. For 2yrs fraudulent providers neglected me to near death (hospitalized twice). I phoned the NQSC on the first day of trading. NQSC told me they did not have to look at cases of neglect prior to their start date. As much of the fraud occured in that period the Commonwealth holds liability for disability disbursement. Between the Commonwealth & NDIA I put it to you a very lot of vulnerable Australians have been robbed.
I am aware from press blurbs that 2024-2025 there was supposed to be reviews of accounts to detect fraudulent old transactions. I can tell you 100% that is a lie. What Labor did was rig the tribunals so we could not expose that lie. My case spanned from Jan 2024 to mid 2025 & across AAT, ART & GAP in all of those “legal areas” I was denied basic Australian Consumer Law rights of proof of debt. The NDIA legal representative had to be given extra time of weeks to try & get a proof of delivery on a bed that cost thousands more than a year after the money had been garnisheed off me & over a year after lying it had been supplied. When exposed the legal representative then lied & said I had refused delivery. I provided email proof that at the time the order had to have occured for the bed & mattress I had not even agreed to a Plan, At that time Plan monies did not carry over. I provided email evidence that I was chasing up bed trials & had been chasing up an NDIS provider contact for a returned call.
It is not an individual submitters case when it has been put through a tribunal. You tell me how any Member could have arrived at a Decision giving NDIA a complete precedence to steal money after witnessing them trying to avoid giving proof of debt for well over a year. The Senior Member set AAT precedence that it was okay to rob disabled participants. I appealed to GAP & got a reply that basically said whatever the Senior Member says is okay by them. Also at point 3,that even if law has been trashed they can refuse to review. That is your brand new Labor stacked ART. The one to replace the old LNP stacked AAT. 2x Labor Attorney Generals Dreyfus & Rowlands both with strong connections to Bill Shorten’s whose thought bubble NDIS was. All 3 are connected to Labor’s Right faction.
In 2024-2025 press blurbs were about the Fraud Fusion Taskforce. The public service did exactly the same in Robodebt. They set up Taskforce Integrity. A joint initiative so they could attack the Robodebt victims more. That 400K win you saw Shorten’s photo op with Gordon Legal was the collateral damage. The real number of Robotic Process Automation Debts was 3 million. You have heard very little about 3 Million Aussies being robbed that is because they nudged the use of the term so you would not look at the process as a whole. I did that & it is why Labor’s RC Robodebt still has the main part of my submission censored. I found there were discrepancies between when Centrelink was declaring payments out to customers as advised to ATO & when they were really going to customers. In my case the period was 6weeks & it crossed an accounting quarter.
I did Business Plan preparation as part of my Dip Acc. NDIS Plan’s are designed to look generous when the reality is the moneys allocations are not in places where you need them. It is illogical a well intentioned honest entity would prepare Plans continually where allocations of money was in places where it was useless for participants. It is illogical that an honest well intentioned entity would not attempt to do reviews, lie its way through tribunal after tribunal. NDIS has 90% fraudulent providers. I put it to you that you do not get to that level of criminality by incompetence. Either the money on those Plans was genuinely to provide disability care to that assessed annual value or it was designed to sit there with the illusiion of being there. I begged AAT Brisbane to calculate a monthly figure put it on a card set for health related purchases only. If that could be done for Cashless Welfare Card why was it a big ask for disabled people. It was a big ask because the purpose was to make sure we never got disability care. When you accept that reality the next question that should be asked is why NDIS needs to be seen to have millions of dollars sat there. Real questions should be asked on how much money sits in NDIS at any given.time & why if it is there every single time we have to fight to get access to our disability care money & essential equipment reimbursed. I want to know exactly where that money is & who is using it. Because I have always paid my taxes with the 7.5% purpose specific tax adjustment.
I’m an approved participant that can’t get any disability needs funded by NDIS without a fight. They never really pay anybody but crooks. Last year I contacted NDIS to establish I had funds on my account. I have have $200k sat there. I have 8years of $100+K Plans where I had no viable access to Plan money other than through a crime ring I refused to use. Ergo only $2600 annual transport deposits. Where’s all the money gone? Unused Plan money is supposed to rollover now. I asked the question. The 2M legal claim that was a settlement to me of about $150k to cover me for the rest of my disabled life 21yrs accounts for the loss of over $800K from my rollover Plan account. How many insurance companies do you know rob you & then steal back your insured benefit payment from them?
I wanted to check my balance to see if I could use it to get a scooter to replace a scooter acknowledged needed in Brisbane Tribunal. I am now in a minor remote community where there are no wheelchair taxis, buses. The scooter is the only means of transport for me to buy food, go to the post office etc. I won a scooter as part of the negotiations at Brisbane tribunal. The scooter was a replacement for a scooter that was out of ATO effective life 5yrs. I am a wheely amputee. I will never be a candidate for a prosthetic or crutches because I have incurable lymphedema. I was advised in Brisbane that I could have Agency management where is it. All businesses have Asset Registers wherein they estimate effective life cycles for timed replacement of depreciated to nothing assets. This was an emergency replacement asset, purchased from an NDIS provider. NDIS refused to pay. I had to buy the scooter myself as I challenged their refusal. For over 6 months now NDIS has refused to reimburse the money & refused my requests for a review of the decision. My plan meeting for my 1 Dec Plan renewal has seen hundreds of thousands disappear from my Plan carry over & no recognition I even had any part in the Plan process. It is obvious from the goals that this is the same Plan goals I had 8 years ago.
Every Plan time when NDIS has phoned me until I moved to Coober Pedy I’ve asked NDIS to provide me with a list of local Support Coordinators that deal with physical conditions. Every Plan time I have reminded NDIS I still have not had a review for my 2019 Plan. I have refused to sign agreements with NDIS because they are a criminal organisation. I have refused to any dealings with them other than in writing because they are bold faced liars. I have not signed or agreed to a Plan in years. NDIS has been signing them.
I saw my transaction list for the first time after my solicitor had advised NDIS she believed there were Special Circumstances due to the level of neglect. The list was complete rubbish. I had bills for a medical bed, mattress & wheelchair cushion I had never even received. When my solicitors saw my reasons for why I disagreed with the transactions they sought the advice on how to get it reviewed. This was the end of 2023. I immediately lodged for the Special Review based on the fraud I saw on the transaction list. This review was in place when the money was garnisheed by NDIA in bad faith. They had no worries about it though because the Australian NDIS AAT ART & GAP are completely stacked. The legal aids are stacked because they are funded by govt directly. Their funding is financially tilted towards a successful outcome for the govt not the participant. Most citizens know the tribunals are crooked as a dogs hind legs & don’t even bother to challenge when robbed by the govt, Robodebt is now up to 3M cases of unlawful debts. There were only 76 successful cases against what was incredible corruption. Most NDIS participants would not be able to remember across over 5yrs the period of a private legal matter how many hours housekeeping they had. My level of neglect though made the rare occasions I actually got something stand out, I had annual plans of over $100K per year across 7yrs they billed me for. Even throwing in fraudulent accounts my entire 7yr transaction list totalled $35K. Less than half a year.
My agreement with the solicitor was for the legal matter. It was financially unviable for them to pursue a $35K case. However, they generously agreed to waive their 50/50% rightful claim in the spirit of encouraging me.
I used the Special Review number & followed the review process given to AAT. A newly appointed by Labor Tribunal Member presided & allowed NDIA’s representative to pervert the course of justice (goes up not down). After me asking for my rights as an Australian citizen under Australian Consumer Law to proof of debt (denied of course) that I knew they could not supply on items never delivered, the NDIS legal representative first presented false information that I had not been told I could get a Special Review. Then when email evidence was provided told the new Member she should send me back for Internal Review (that I note from the email address was conducted by the same dept). The new Member ignored my requests that the matter should be referred to the NACC. I had put to that tribunal evidence that either improper protocols of review process had occured & the information that multiple entries on my transaction list had not been supplied. Had it been a single entry on my transaction list human error could have been a factor. I had transactions that had no description & not even an expense category.
My reviews were after the Pintarich decision & yet NDIA has been systemically across all my reviews (& I bet others) ignored it. In USA’s Taylor Bean Whittaker vs Colonial mutual case PwC admitted the long standing international principle that a transaction was a true reflection of a financial event. The validation of that is source documents. Finding out that PwC was a registered provider offering services to assist providers in qualifying was gobsmacking. It is not rocket science. If Mr Dardo’s testimony to Senate shows that at 90% of Plan Managers with “significant indicators of fraud” NDIA itself has been committing theft & fraud in almost every single private legal action by claiming compensation. I want my money back. I want the money back of every single disabled participant that did not self-manage & was forced to use NDIA’s registered crime ring. The money was not stolen by those providers off me. It was stolen by NDIA who acted as a fence.
My money was stolen & the farcical ARTs new GAP summed up in my 2025 Decision why they should be shut down immediately. Even if it knew a Senior Members Decision was flawed in law they can choose what they review. Repeat: "concealing a serious indictable offence" or "misprision of felony".
On 2 occasions this Senior Member asked me what my assets were. It seems justice is not blind at all. At that time I was considering a push for the higher court. When I realised I had been in a stacked AAT, ART & GAP there was only one place that blanket ignorance of the law was coming from - the politically appointed Labor Attorney General. Both Dreyfus & Rowlands were in tight with Bill Shorten whose thought bubble NDIS was. Ms Rowlands had an love Bill Shorten post as per pinned tweet at one time. In fact the Attorney General’s office is handling the review for how disabled human rights have been treated in Australia. Of course limiting it to an update on how Disability Royal Commission has progressed. I’m going to make sure the UN gets a good background history on why Australian’s formal submission is as good as toilet paper.
I think after an AAT, ART & GAP I have demonstrated there is no viable legal options in Australia for disabled people fighting obvious fraud & theft by Australian Parliament House. The lack of legal aid for what are criminal matters knowingly perpetrated against us is appalling. I’m going to lodge a Crimes Against Humanity action to ICC. What you see is what they are going to get & more. My win is for years of care but is just a single number on a legal aid form. I got 45minutes to go up against an experienced legal on an unlimited public purse payroll. A legal that has seen the propaganda that it is participants that are the thieving crooks who claim sex drugs & cruises. In Robodebt there was only supposed to be 300 vulnerables experimented on but they shifted the same Robodebt public servants to a bigger payday.
The first review was a review of the compensation amount NDIS claimed I owed. The second review details were requested by my solicitor because the level of my care & equipment supply was so poor I was hospitalised twice. NDIS gave her in writing a review advice for a Special Review. One specifically to detect fraud. A Special Review request was lodged, but still NDIS held up the legal disbursements to me of my case win & garnished money they had to know was more than probably funds fraudulently claimed based on a transaction list that had no human intervention excepting a rubber stamp DENIED. I used my review number & lodged to the only place I could AAT. NDIS legal representative abused process & lied that I had not been told to lodge a Special Review. I produced the email from NDIS to contradict that to the public tribunal. As part of my arguments I showed that their were specific guide protocols that were not being followed if I had been given the wrong advice on my review direction. I told the tribunal of items of equipment that had never been supplied but that money had been taken by NDIS in bad faith. The legal representative then argued that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction. I begged that the newly apointed by Dreyfus Labor Member to refer the matter to NACC. Instead like a dog on a leash the “Member” did exactly what the NDIA’s legal representrative wanted. She sent the matter back to NDIS for me to have an Internal Review. This was so Labor could change both NDIS legislation & shut down AAT & stack the ART NDIS with compliant Members to cover up the breathtaking level of corruption being dished out by NDIA itself.
I was later in the public ART able to prove that major equipment had never been supplied. This was despite the ART Senior Member denying me my Australian Consumer Law rights to debt validation on every single transaction I was charged. I note at this time I had had a compo review, a special review & internal review & still NDIA could not provide proof of the debts on my transaction list. The Senior Member then cherry picked accounts from a transaction list that was miles of nothing supplied excepting the transport allowance automatically deposited to my account. I had refused to use NDIS until I could get my 2nd review that they were never going to give me because I could prove all Qld wheelies were being discriminated in the provision of the transport allowance amount. I got a review for a review. I passed that & despite reminding plan reviewers every single year that I had not had my 2nd plan review I have never had that review.
It is not rocket science. If NDIA’s Integrity Chief reported that 90% of NDIA providers had indicators of fraud, then oncharging a participant’s unchecked transaction list to participant’s who have private legal actions & garnisheeing the money from the participant’s legal win was theft & fraud on a breathtaking scale. The systemic way in which mine was processed shows all compensation cases that have garnisheed money from participants have had similar treatment.
It is not rocket science that if disabled people have private legal wins then those wins are for a future of care, equipment & housing modifications. People who have limited funds have limited legal options to pursue legal actions & have only one real chance for it 50/50% legal settlements. NDIS though is charging for compensation & claiming 100% of compensation instead of 50%. They pay nothing towards the legal costs. Ergo their “compensation” is an s51xxxi unjust 100% property acquisition.
It is not rocket science. If NDIA advertises that the NDIS scheme is not means tested, will provide more choice & control & will operate like an insurance company it has falsly advertised its benefits. NDIA should have no right to claim any “compensation” at all. I was able to claim more than one total permanent disability insurance claim without it affecting my Centrelink benefits & without being asked to repay any “compensation” for past Disability Support Pension (DSP). NDIA though has advertised NDIS as an “Insurance Scheme”. Insurance entities pay legitimate claimed insurance claims, but at no time do they ask for the money back. All Australians have paid for their home care if they become vulnerable. It was part of the promised National Welfare Fund (NWF) legislated across 1943-6 that was the forerunner for the referendum that led to the referendum that saw the creation of the 1947 Social Security Act. Part of that referendum agreement was a 7.5% income tax bracket adjustment. Vulnerables home care was paid for just as if they had paid any private insurance company. In fact Australians Social Social Security has been overpaid. We have had numerous additional “health” levvies eg Medicare & Smokers Levies. Just the purpose specific NWF surplus between revenue & expenditure alone showed surplus in 1950 proving viability. The purpose specific money was moved from a trust account to Consolidated Revenue. Now we have despite extra levies waiting lists for vulnerable home care, a Future Fund in serious trouble & an Australian Public Service looking for Robodebt McNamara’s “Savings” & a crime ring operated by NDIA.
It is not rocket science that the whole point of having a separate tribunal for NDIS should be so disabled participants with poorer access to legal assistance & resources eg legal libraries can get more help. I got a 45 minute session with a community legal service to face a qualified legal paid by public funds. This of course means NDIS tribunal is not meeting s51 good goverment Order. It is an offence of Natural Justice to not let the other side be heard in a balanced scale of justice. Most NDIS participants & their carers would not know that they have been robbed by NDIA in compensation cases. They would have so little paperwork they would not be able to prove their cases. Most legal representatives in private matters would not know what usage levels their clients had with NDIS. I have a 143IQ & 10yrs+ of senior bookkeeping behind me I knew immediately the plans they were raising were persuasively written purpose specific to appear generous but deny care in valid areas. In point of fact I raised this in my Fiona Meagher Brisbane AAT trial by corrupt fire.
It is not rocket science. If a participant (me) can prove in a public tribunal that I did not trial, order or receive a $4000K+ medical bed & proved that it was ordered at a time when I did not have an agreed plan, had no plan money carried over from my old plan, had advised both a tribunal’s legal appointed support coordinator/plan manager that I would not be liable for any purchases until a plan was agreed to I should not have been expected to have money stolen from my plan account by NDIA by garnishee for said bed that I never received. This was just one of the totally corrupt transactions on my transaction list the subject of a garnishee. When the Senior Member humoured my repeat requests that I had a proof of delivery, after 3x reviews NDIS needed more time to come back with an answer that I had refused delivery. The Member had before her proof NDIS representatives were lying but hey it’s our good ole corrupt public servant mates in the hot seat. How dare a disabled participant object & expose across 2x tribunals that NDIA are rotten to the snakes head. 100% you can rob this upstart NDIA because I get my job from a govt now Labor Attorney General & I’ve got that job until I don’t set the precedence too rob disabled they want. How did GAP treat my appeal request to what was exposing a breathtaking level of fraud & theft being done by NDIA itself - what the Senior ART Member say’s is good enough for us & we don’t have to review blatently corrupt decision if we don’t want to. It is all about setting precedence & the precedence Labor wants is the NDIS participants have no choice & control & can be robbed at will be them. S51 Natural Justice no man a judge in his own case flew right out the window.
It is not rocket science that when an NDIS participant has a legal win paid for by the participant solely because NDIS pays nothing that win is for the purpose of disability care. It is a disgrace that the participant has no legally public funded capacity to take that matter to High Court other than using their private legal win to fund it. The participants legal win means they likely do not qualify for legal aid. An individual taking the theft by NDIS to yet another legal venue stacked by an Attorney General appointed by the same party that wants a precedence to say they haven’t been robbing participants for years is financially just stupid. I’ve decided instead because of my inability to get affordable justice in Australia to take my action as a complementary Crimes Against Humanity action to the International Criminal Court where they apply Natural Justice. I can lodge a complementary action because I can show in Disability care, Robodebt & Covid19 & all the Communication censorships across all three there was been a progression towards the point where like in WWII jews are being mowed down in the street. The disabled were the first people targeted in WWII & I have 8yrs to prove bipartisan both Labor & Liberals who created this horror have actively refused to tackle the criminality for years & helped it to thrive everyway they could. The UN has just released an advice that it will be looking at how the Royal Commission Disability has implemented its recommendations. I’m going to make sure it gets an awful lot of help them.
It is not rocket science that you do not get to a 90% fraud rating unless the corruption is in NDIA itself.
Comments
Post a Comment